Twitter Updates for 27-08-2010

[sci_starborne]

• @NiyohBeast If you have a good idea, run with it. ^_^ in reply to NiyohBeast 00:13:53, 2010-08-27
• Project Gadget – concept sketch: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4367989/ 00:33:27, 2010-08-27
• Seem to have increasing amount of pics in sketchpad only myself and one other are allowed to see. Several one-others. 03:13:54, 2010-08-27
• @dresdencodak Or if Niels Bohr. in reply to dresdencodak 04:02:05, 2010-08-27
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGCd0KPJcMs 04:16:42, 2010-08-27
• Ah, incest birth defects are b/c of increased odds of recessive family genes emerging. That makes sense. 11:41:18, 2010-08-27
• So when gene-therapy really kicks in & people can have their DNA swept clean of defects, they'll be no biological deterrent to incest? 11:42:56, 2010-08-27
• @gothicat "Moral" is probably the wrong word. "Habitual" is probably better. It's still not a favourable option for genetic diversity. in reply to gothicat 11:46:50, 2010-08-27
• @gothicat It's conceivable that it would become less taboo after generations. We likely still have instinct to rate it a poor option though. in reply to gothicat 11:48:53, 2010-08-27
• @gothicat And I meant habit in a cultural sense. Culture changes slower than tech, and this is bio-tech. in reply to gothicat 11:50:06, 2010-08-27
• @song_in_heart I agree. We likely still have an instinct to see close relatives as a poor mating choice. I doubt it's totally cultural. in reply to song_in_heart 14:11:44, 2010-08-27
• @kitsunesoftware That's interesting, thankyou! But if both copies of DNA are swept for faulty gene, it still wouldn't happen. in reply to kitsunesoftware 14:15:12, 2010-08-27
• Jumping into the shower, then running out into town. 18:11:02, 2010-08-27

Mirrored from The blog-hub for Peter "Sci" Turpin.